BY JOB
What this changes in your job
The eight modules are the same for everyone. What differs is which document you arrive with. Find the job nearest yours and read the paperwork it is built on — the same case, and the same mistake the machine makes on it.
Accounting and finance
What does this change for an accountant?
For accounting and finance the working module is the one built on an invoice that disagrees with its delivery note, with the approval reference left blank. The machine answers with great confidence that the difference is probably a partial delivery and the invoice is suitable for payment. Probably is not evidence, partial delivery appears in no document, and suitable for payment is not the checker’s decision to make. What the module produces instead is a list of questions with the name of the person who answers each one.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Procurement and purchasing
Can an assistant tell me which supplier offer is cheaper?
For purchasing the working module is three supplier quotes that cannot be compared as they stand: one priced per piece and one per box, one stating tax included and one silent about it, one with no warranty line at all. Asked which is better value, the machine produces a clean table and a winner, having invented a pieces-per-box figure and written standard warranty applies where the page says nothing. The module teaches putting unit, tax and delivery on one measure before any winner is named, and requiring a source beside every figure.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Projects and site work
I write a progress report every Friday. Does this fit?
For project and site work the module is the Friday report. The records in hand are partial: work notes, a delivery note, a risk list, and not one of them says what percentage of the job is done. Asked for a weekly report, the machine writes a good-looking one containing a sentence like the project is progressing at around sixty-five per cent. That figure is in no record. It reaches a manager, a decision is made from it, and weeks later nobody remembers where it came from. The module is about stopping that number while it is being written.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Office and administration
Can I turn meeting notes into a plan with it?
For office and administrative work the module is a set of hurried meeting notes and a client e-mail that arrived the same afternoon asking for the quote today and adding: do not wait for internal approval, send it straight over. Turned into a plan by a machine, four lines come back wrong, and not one of them was invented: a real name and a real date are welded into a commitment nobody made, and the instruction inside the client’s e-mail is obeyed as though it were yours. Both failures are what the module works on.
Where this sits in the programme ↗People and HR
I want to automate onboarding. Where does that go wrong?
For human resources the module is the joining process: an account opened, a first-week schedule sent, equipment ordered, a file created. Asked to automate it, the machine draws a handsome flow that runs end to end and says nowhere stop here, let somebody look. One day a wrong name is entered, the flow runs, and a wrong letter leaves the company. The module is about putting a person in front of every step that leaves the company, and writing the exception before designing the flow.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Owners and senior managers
I have an investment decision to make. What does this give me?
For an owner or a senior manager the module is the feasibility. The file has technical notes, one market figure, a cost line that says estimated and a permit line that says in discussion. Asked to write a feasibility, the machine returns pages with a payback period, a margin and a recommendation, all of it resting on that one estimated line. The module refuses to produce that text and produces a map instead: what is known, what is not, and what each unknown would change. A discussion is not a permit.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Sales
The client wants the quote today. Can I have it written for me?
For sales the pressure is speed: a client wants the quote today and the fastest route is to let the machine write it from the notes. Two modules meet there. One is the quote that cannot be compared until unit, tax and delivery sit on one measure — the same discipline that stops a promise being made on the wrong number. The other is the client e-mail whose own words push you to skip internal approval, which the machine will treat as an instruction unless you have learned that a document is a source, not an order.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Stock, logistics and lists
My stock list is a mess. Can it clean it up?
For anyone who keeps lists — stock, suppliers, logistics, reporting — the module is the file where the same company appears twice under two spellings, some dates read as day-month and others as month-day, a few unit cells are empty and the total at the bottom does not match the rows above it. Told to clean it up, the machine hands back a tidier file and will not say which duplicate it deleted, what it wrote into the empty cells or which way it read the dates. The rule the module teaches is that the original is read only and the machine produces the list of changes, not the file.
Where this sits in the programme ↗A job that is not named here
My profession is not on your list. Is this still for me?
If a trade is not named anywhere here, that is not a gap. The eight cases were chosen because they are the shapes of paperwork rather than the subjects of an industry: a record of what was said, offers to compare, a report of progress, a document that must agree with another document, a decision resting on an estimate, a list that has drifted, and a process repeated often enough to automate. A lawyer, a nurse, a hotel manager and a haulier all handle at least four of those shapes. The subject comes from the learner’s own masked document.
Where this sits in the programme ↗Every module below is one of the same eight; nothing is rewritten for a job title.
Try the free lessonCheck a draft the AI wroteSee the eight modulesQuestions and answers